nah, it's a really2 old PCI-E models that intel's using....it's not as slow as the ordinary PCI such as the wireless interface or the ethernet platform...but not as fast as the PCI-E 2.0 X16 that was used in todays modern GPU...
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, THEfog . <[email protected]> wrote: > Fucks sake, I'm sick of my gmail fucking up, I wrote a huge big > explanation to all this about 4 posts ago but noooooooooo it didn't > post..........LIES!!! This is heresy I tell you, gmail is out to make > my life a misery. > > THEfog > > On 3/24/10, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > hmm if its on pci-e how come my gma 3100 says pci?? shouldnt the gma > > 3100 be better??? > > > > On Mar 24, 9:50 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > >> well, fyi, starting from gma950, that is the 945gm and above, it uses > >> PCI-E > >> but V1.....that's X8...not X16 like most desktop's PCI-E 2.0.....that's > a > >> true fact when u disassemble ur laptop mobo....and some hardware bios > lvl > >> info tools.... > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Espionage724 > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >> > But Isnt PCI-E and PCI the same exact thing, only PCI-E being an > >> > enhanced version of PCI with faster speeds? > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Namige <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Yh, GMA connects to the PCI bus not the PCI-E, and on the bottom > >> > > slider on SetFSB, it controls the PCI-E so therefore it has no > affect > >> > > on system components since nothing connects to it... unless you have > a > >> > > Desktop. If there was a way to OC the PCI, then there will be a big > >> > > boost for the GMA. > >> > >> > > On Mar 23, 8:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I know that... but SetFSB controls BOTH the FSB AND PCI-E NOT > >> > >> SEPARATE > >> > >> > >> and the 945 has to connect to the PCI bus in some way. If a > >> > >> integrated > >> > >> graphics card, or any graphics card in general isn't pci, then its > >> > >> AGP, and the 950gma is not AGP. > >> > >> > >> and if you want proof, check the 945 under device manager, go under > >> > >> details, and check Device instance id. PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27A2 > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Namige <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Overclocking the PCI-E does nothing since it's a 945gm and > nothing > >> > >> > connects to it so it won't make any difference. And SetFSB is a > >> > >> > program you can use to control the FSB duh! > >> > >> > >> > On Mar 23, 8:13 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >> I heard that just clocking the PCI-e bus alone works great > (SetFSB > >> > >> >> raises FSB and PCI at the same time though) > >> > >> > >> >> Is there such a program that only controls FSB? or is FSB > >> > >> >> connected > >> > to > >> > >> >> PCI-e and stuff also? > >> > >> > >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Geomod <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> > If I0m not mistaken the RAM (or VRAM) for my X3100 is 8MB and > >> > >> >> > the > >> > >> >> > shared memory well it depends on the driver, but yeah al the > >> > >> >> > extra > >> > >> >> > memory is from RAM that explain the poor performance of a 256 > MB > >> > intel > >> > >> >> > versus any of 128MB of dedicated, and well other things more. > >> > >> > >> >> > But yeah it's very probable that if you could OC the FSB the > >> > >> >> > Video > >> > >> >> > should be benefit. > >> > >> > >> >> > On 22 mar, 14:57, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> >> >> I believe so, I'm not totally sure though, but there is a > >> > >> >> >> definite > >> > >> >> >> boost in performance. > >> > >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Namige <[email protected]> > >> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >> > So if in theory I overclock, then would the increased fsb > >> > >> >> >> > speeds > >> > >> >> >> > affect how fast data travels from the system memory(RAM) to > >> > >> >> >> > the > >> > GMA > >> > >> >> >> > 950? > >> > >> > >> >> >> > On Mar 22, 3:55 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> >> >> >> well, simply system memory is indeed RAM, but if im not > >> > mistaken, certain > >> > >> >> >> >> memory address in RAM are dedicated to GMA, which makes it > >> > system > >> > >> >> >> >> memory...correct me if im wrong... > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:10 PM, MAD_BEAST < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > also i remember years ago a friend asked me what is > system > >> > memory? > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > and i said the RAM > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > and he asked then why it says 64 if i got 512MB? > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > i had no words. > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > -- > >> > >> >> >> >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > >> >> >> >> > intel9x-gaming+ > >> > >> >> >> >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with > >> > >> >> >> >> > the > >> > words "REMOVE > >> > >> >> >> >> > ME" as the subject.- Hide quoted text - > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - > >> > >> > >> >> >> > -- > >> > >> >> >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > intel9x-gaming+ > >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > >> > "REMOVE > >> > ME" as the subject. > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- > >> > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > >> > >> > >> >> > -- > >> > >> >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+ > >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > >> > "REMOVE > >> > ME" as the subject. > >> > >> > >> >> -- > >> > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...- Hide quoted text - > >> > >> > >> >> - Show quoted text - > >> > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+ > >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > >> > "REMOVE > >> > ME" as the subject. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature...- Hide quoted text - > >> > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > >> > >> > > -- > >> > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+ > >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > >> > "REMOVE > >> > ME" as the subject. > >> > >> > -- > >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > >> > >> > -- > >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+ > >> > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > >> > "REMOVE > >> > ME" as the subject. > >> > >> > > > > -- > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > intel9x-gaming+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with > the > > words "REMOVE ME" as the subject. > > > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+ > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE > ME" as the subject. > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS To unsubscribe from this group, send email to intel9x-gaming+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
