So it seems that it might be more related to raw cpu clock rather than multi-core. Seems almost odd since we're at a time where everything and everyone (at least who works for intel and amd) wants us to believe that the future now relies no more in increased clocks and only in more and more cores, when there are situations that only work efficiently when single threaded.
On Jun 7, 5:07 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > im gonna test it again on one core and see how it goes...for the sake of our > brother Espi..lol... > mind that my scores are using my own V1.1.. > > spec : > Core Duo T2300E 1.67GHz > 1gb RAM > windows 7 32bit Ultimate > using my own V1.1 drivers > > results on both of my cores active.. > > CPU : 4.1 > Memory : 4.5 > Graphics :3.4 > Gaming :3.2 > HDD :4.3 > base scores :3.2 > > results when only one core are active. (wow, WEI rating are much more longer > than usual) > > errr....pretty much the same as above...im confuse here... > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Can somebody with a 950GMA and a dual core CPU limit theirselves to 1 > > core and retest? > > > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:46 PM, harry911 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > cpu:4.6 > > > ram:5.3 > > > gfx:3.3 > > > gaming gfx:3.3 > > > harddisk:5.9 > > > > i use w7,2gb ram,intel c2d e7500,320gb segate barracuda,gma 950-alpha > > > drivers > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
