I have games that I'm simply waiting to have a better computer to play them, and even though I'm dying to enjoy those games, if I can just barely play I «ll prefer to hold out for more time. A good example is a good looking yet not so good game, farcry 2, I've played it at minimum on one computer and at maximum on other and it's like day and night, so I'll just wait until I can enjoy crysis with high to ultra settings, with medium resolution and no aa.
On Jun 20, 4:30 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > @Tribaljet > Yes I agree that 12fps isn't how crysis is meant to be played but if you > really really wanted to play it and had no other option then 12fps is a bare > minimum, although the shuttering effect will be percivable controls should > still be responsive enough to enjoy the game, but as you said there are some > games which demand a silky smooth framerate to be playable, I mean just look > at assasins crees 1 and 2, imagine trying to play that properly on anything > less then 25fps lol good luck > > THEfog > > On 21/06/2010 1:21 AM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Regarding Doom 3 and Farcry, I sincerely believe those are games not > meant to be played at minimum settings. I've seen then on high/ultra > settings and are a sight for sore eyes :) and is nothing short of a > crime to run them at less than medium settings. Of course crysis > doesn't run, and 12fps isn't playable at all, specially on a genre > which needs fluidity. > Did you get to try need for speed world while the servers were > running? > > On Jun 20, 4:15 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @Tribaljet > > I agree with you pa... > > On 21/06/2010 12:42 AM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was going to lol about on... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
