Btw, on a non related note and i think i already mentioned this before, do you know that enabling sw vs makes some games look worse? and yes, i know sometimes its the only way to be able to run them.
On Sep 9, 6:35 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > undercover do ran though with XP compatibility, but some reports heavy CPU > usage, that was on the Vista MD era that is... > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:33 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought nfs undercover ran a little better than that > > > On Sep 9, 5:58 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Unless you like playing racing games at 2-3 FPS lol than its perfect. > > > > THEfog > > > > On 10/09/2010 2:45 AM, "hussam aulaian" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > oh shit how did i read that one wrong , OMG , im such a Douche , > > > > @opel : forget wht i said man , undercover is totaly unplayable on GMA > > 950 > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Laptop: > Acer Aspire > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > Intel GMA 950 IGP > Intel 945 Chipset > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > 80GB standard PATA HDD > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
