Though only at 800x600 :( but I could run dx10 mode at 30-40 :) On Sep 10, 3:57 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > From the time I had a g105, it played quite well between 40-55 fps :D > > On Sep 10, 3:37 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I can play at 20ish on my radeon hd 3200. > > > Enviromental quality really affects FPS, as does shadows. > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:22 AM, TanCH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > How many fps are acknowledged as playable? this answer is depend on > > > the user himself~~ > > > and i will be one of the "quite some people" >.< > > > i just cant stop try to play my favorite game even it is at lower than > > > 10fps unless i keep die in that game... haha > > > i have played almost all resident evil and devil may cry series in my > > > gma950^^, > > > but no luck with RE5, RE5 with warp10 is super very extremely laggy, i > > > couldn't aim to shoot the enemy at all. > > > For me... DMC4 with warp10 still can be played, at least in Bloody > > > Palace Mode~~~~^^ > > > > On Sep 10, 1:22 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Lol, a few weeks ago there was a discussion about how many fps are > > >> acknowledged as playable, and even though I advocated as 14-15 being a > > >> bare minimum, there were quite some people saying they could play at > > >> 10fps. I understand you quite well, but given the hardware we're > > >> using, you should be glad you can play at your fps a game which does > > >> seem to have high requirements. > > > >> On Sep 10, 1:12 am, ThaGaimz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > This is pretty much what happened, but 18 FPS is not playable for > > >> > me :/ > > > >> > On Sep 9, 2:41 pm, IntelgratedShiznit <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > I played it on: > > >> > > 1.8ghz Intel Celeron M > > >> > > 512mb RAM > > >> > > Windows 7 > > >> > > Intel GMA 950 > > > >> > > It is playable at about 18FPS, but loading times are hell. > > > >> > > On Sep 9, 9:34 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > A game that recommends not a geforce 8 series but specifically a > > >> > > > 8800 > > >> > > > is probably unplayable on the gma 950. That along with the fact > > >> > > > that > > >> > > > game might be single threaded, so having a dual core might not > > >> > > > help, > > >> > > > hence the need for such higher clocks. > > > >> > > > On Sep 9, 3:46 pm, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > i think ur CPU might be the handi cap here > > > >> > > > > Minimum System Requirements > > > >> > > > > * 2 GHz processor > > >> > > > > * 1 GB RAM > > >> > > > > * 750 MB available hard disk space > > >> > > > > * Shader version 2.0 capable video card > > >> > > > > * DirectX 9.0 capable video card > > >> > > > > * Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista SP1, or Windows 7 (Mac OS is > > >> > > > > currently not > > >> > > > > supported) > > > >> > > > > Recommended System Requirements > > > >> > > > > * 3 GHz processor > > >> > > > > * 1 GB RAM > > >> > > > > * 750 MB available hard disk space > > >> > > > > * GeForce 8800 or equivalent video card > > >> > > > > * Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista SP1, or Windows 7 (Mac OS is > > >> > > > > currently not > > >> > > > > supported) > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > Acer TravelMate 2480 > > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA > >
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
