Ok but the benchmarks from a GT230M in comparison with that ati are in advantage of the ATI again... But I found a sony vaio with a GT230M, specs:
Processor: Intel ® Core ™ 2 Duo Processor P8700 (2.53 GHz) 14" WXGA LED display (1366 x 768) NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 230M graphics Ram: ??? I'm not sure but I think it's a pink or red one (If it's pink it's out of question!) Also the Toshiba guy agreed with my 425 bid, but I can still cancel it because it isn't totally arranged yet! I'm going to kickbox now, I'm back within 2 hours! Let me know! On 22 sep, 18:30, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > MSI WIND, cod mw2 is a fairly simple game to drive, which doesn't push > hw too much. Try checking if you find a laptop with a GT230M > > On Sep 22, 5:28 pm, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yeah but benchmark for the ATI Modern Warfare 2 on high: 34 FPS and > > for the GeForce 9600 GT Modern Warfare 1 on high: 25.7 FPS... So I > > don't get it why a 9600 should be better than the ATI, altough the > > features the 9600 won't be able to run a new game on high settings > > (fps wise) while that ATI is! It's probably because I'm a rookie... > > You guys have been a great help btw! > > > On 22 sep, 18:21, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And it seems that nvidia antialiasing is faster than ati. > > > > On Sep 22, 5:18 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Oh, and hw physx of course :) > > > > > On Sep 22, 5:16 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Well, first there is Cuda, which is a godsend for any who plays high > > > > > definition content, then you do have a faster geometry instancing than > > > > > ati, for some reason it is faster but I'm not sure why exactly as from > > > > > a specs point of view it shouldn't. A quite good nvidia gpu thats > > > > > faster than 9600GT and probably at the same price is the GT230M, with > > > > > the added support for dx10.1, which is something that the gpu can > > > > > handle, while that ati will probably die trying to push dx11 content. > > > > > > On Sep 22, 5:12 pm, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah but there are no i5 processor within my budget, at least not in > > > > > > combination with a good gpu... I understand the way ATI names their > > > > > > cards but in comparison with a 9600m GT that ATI kicks it ass > > > > > > (benchmarks, graphics etc.)... But what features does this card miss > > > > > > in comparison with for example the Nvidia 9500/9600? > > > > > > > On 22 sep, 18:05, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > i3 is nothing special, it's the lowest cpu of the new labeling. > > > > > > > i5 is > > > > > > > the minimum you should be aiming for, specially because you have > > > > > > > many > > > > > > > kinds of i5, both cheap and expensive, slower and faster. And then > > > > > > > there is i7, and the world was never the same... ;) > > > > > > > > On Sep 22, 5:01 pm, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok thanks tribaljet! But Hussam why is it crap? Because it's > > > > > > > > ranked > > > > > > > > higher than the 9600 GT, the only score the 9600 GT outformed > > > > > > > > the ATI > > > > > > > > was Shader processing, also the CPU benchmarks for the ATI are > > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > better than the 9600GT... Also the i3 processor isn't the best > > > > > > > > i3 > > > > > > > > processor but altough it's a new/good processor right?! By > > > > > > > > new/good I > > > > > > > > mean technology wise > > > > > > > > > On 22 sep, 17:49, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ATI 5145 & 5165 is only an entry level in the 5xxx series- > > > > > > > > > Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - > > > > > > > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -- Tekst uit > > > > > > > oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - > > > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk > > > bericht niet weergeven - > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
