wow, that's good news... hmm, about the capabilities, im amazed on how much the GMA 950 to offer...when the rev 2 was in the making, i see some of many features available for the 945 have been disabled mainly SSE3 and other stuffs....which kinda show how ignorance they are towards their customers....lol....well, since the release of rev 2...i can still find many features that can be enable, so more to come on rev 3...
plus i want to apologize for taking such a long time to release, i've been busy for a while and my college term just started, plus life isnt so good for me right now, so much to do, so much to think about, too much problem, to much sadness, too much work...lol...that's a little over reacting...lol.... but 50 of the rev 3 improvements had alrady done...so i do what i can to finish...again im sorry...keep up with the testing and feedbacks....thanks ^^ On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to mention how intel denied nvidia the rights to use their bus > tech for new motherboards. I just hope the new tegra makes all those > puny androids, iphones and windows phones crap their pants, could be a > major turn around for a chunk of that recent IT segment. > > On Sep 25, 3:14 am, uncleferassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yea, it seems like hussam was right, Intel knew the capabilities of > > the GMA but didn't bother to activate them >:( > > On Sep 24, 7:04 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It surely shows how diff drivers are now since stock 1504 for vista :) > > > Back then I could play swat 4 with 1024x768 and min settings at 30-45 > > > fps. But then again, you have a better cpu than me :'( > > > > > On Sep 25, 3:01 am, uncleferassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > yea it was with addreg(igrm) and it was value 1 (software) > > > > > > On Sep 24, 6:47 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > :O > > > > > Was that with addreg, and if yes, what value? > > > > > > > On Sep 25, 2:46 am, uncleferassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just tested Swat 4 and got 25 fps constant with 1280x1024 res and > max > > > > > > settings. :D > > > > > > > > On Sep 21, 2:11 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You really think you're the only one with an embedded chipset > that's > > > > > > > yet to be fully supported? Chill man, Angelic is doing his > best, but > > > > > > > you better be careful, I heard that the last beta drugged your > coffee > > > > > > > and made you obscene things, making you sit sideways for the > next > > > > > > > couple days... > > > > > > > So maybe it's best you wait for the next revision or final > version :) > > > > > > > > > On Sep 21, 8:21 pm, MaxiJazz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I know this link, my post is just emotion. > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Laptop: Acer Aspire Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz Intel GMA 950 IGP Intel 945 Chipset 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 80GB standard PATA HDD Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
