Very strange that you have such high results. I've seen full blown midrange gpus performing much worse than you.
This needs results from more people and further investigation. Kiki, care to look further into what causes the variations? Also, Angelic, can you tell us if the Acceleration.Level is working with the same value name in V1.2? As so far, the only 2 results other than me were using V1.2 beta2, while I'm using V1.1E. On Oct 2, 9:11 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes > > On Oct 2, 1:10 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are those results from your C2D? > > > On Oct 2, 9:07 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Value 0 > > > BitBlt: > > > avg: 1828.2 fps [2142.5 MB/sec] > > > max: 4348.9 fps [5096.3 MB/sec] > > > min: 94.7 fps [110.9 MB/sec] > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > avg: 3353.3 fps [3929.7 MB/sec] > > > max: 4008.8 fps [4697.8 MB/sec] > > > min: 2206.4 fps [2585.7 MB/sec] > > > > Value 4 > > > BitBlt: > > > avg: 1851.6 fps [2169.9 MB/sec] > > > max: 4368.4 fps [5119.2 MB/sec] > > > min: 176.0 fps [206.2 MB/sec] > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > avg: 2480.3 fps [2906.6 MB/sec] > > > max: 3268.9 fps [3830.8 MB/sec] > > > min: 1443.2 fps [1691.2 MB/sec] > > > > Value 5 > > > BitBlt: > > > avg: 1811.4 fps [2122.7 MB/sec] > > > max: 4378.2 fps [5130.7 MB/sec] > > > min: 93.4 fps [109.4 MB/sec] > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > avg: 4009.7 fps [4698.8 MB/sec] > > > max: 4042.1 fps [4736.8 MB/sec] > > > min: 3835.2 fps [4494.4 MB/sec] > > > > On Oct 2, 12:46 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's DWORD with hexa base. > > > > > On Oct 2, 8:45 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I gonna try to make the key manually but Tribal, can you tell us what > > > > > kind of entry is it? (dsword, string, binary?) > > > > > > On Oct 2, 12:43 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Here's mine. Same as Kiki, don't have the Acceleration.Level key > > > > > > because I have 1.2 sherry. > > > > > > I ran it with value 1 addreg (software) > > > > > > > BitBlt: > > > > > > avg: 3250.2 fps [3808.9 MB/sec] > > > > > > max: 4145.3 fps [4857.8 MB/sec] > > > > > > min: 1128.8 fps [1322.8 MB/sec] > > > > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > > > > avg: 3534.6 fps [4142.2 MB/sec] > > > > > > max: 4050.5 fps [4746.7 MB/sec] > > > > > > min: 2632.8 fps [3085.3 MB/sec] > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 11:44 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Unless people cooperate, things can't go forward. > > > > > > > > Each one of you must test different values and benchmark your > > > > > > > system > > > > > > > with BltTest. > > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 6:17 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I ask for more people to test different values and post results > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > TestBlt bench, so we can have a proper opinion on it. > > > > > > > > > Just remember to restart after each value change. > > > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 1:55 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well, that software is very sensitive to what's happening in > > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > computer at the precise moment you're doing things, but even > > > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > > > downloading and having a movie loaded in the background > > > > > > > > > (paused > > > > > > > > > though), the results were almost the same. > > > > > > > > > Anyway, don't forget that you have to restart your computer > > > > > > > > > each time > > > > > > > > > you change Acceleration.Level, for the changes to actually be > > > > > > > > > applied. > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 10:07 am, Kiki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > uhm... I'm trying to run BltTest.exe atm (is this the right > > > > > > > > > > program > > > > > > > > > > that we're using right now?) > > > > > > > > > > > I run it with no changes (means "Acceleration.Level" key is > > > > > > > > > > not exist > > > > > > > > > > in my registry originally, because I'm using 7 + Sherry 1.2) > > > > > > > > > > > so far I run it over and over, and got some random numbers > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes I get high numbers like these: > > > > > > > > > > BitBlt: > > > > > > > > > > avg: 979.9 fps [1148.4 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > max: 1372.1 fps [1607.9 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > min: 385.1 fps [451.3 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > > > > > > > > avg: 1125.4 fps [1318.8 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > max: 1306.5 fps [1531.1 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > min: 826.4 fps [968.5 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > > but sometimes I get low numbers like these: > > > > > > > > > > BitBlt: > > > > > > > > > > avg: 671.9 fps [787.4 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > max: 1061.0 fps [1243.4 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > min: 142.1 fps [166.5 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > > ReverseBlt: > > > > > > > > > > avg: 288.5 fps [338.1 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > max: 1039.1 fps [1217.7 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > min: 40.3 fps [47.3 MB/sec] > > > > > > > > > > > is this really can represent the overall performance of my > > > > > > > > > > computer? > > > > > > > > > > or is the value is like some "snapshot" performance (== > > > > > > > > > > performance at > > > > > > > > > > that dd mmmm yyyy, hh:mm:ss tt only?) > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
