Hmm I don't know anything about modding, always used modded drivers
from here and their praised the people who build them! But I now tried
to get drivers from the sony site like ATi said I should look their,
but no luck they don't recognize my model :S... If 10.10 comes out
will I come across the same problem? Otherwise can somebody help me to
mod that 10.9 driver, I can provide the id's etc.. but don't know
anything about modding :(

On 5 okt, 20:07, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, vendor hardware lockdown these days only happens
> with ati gpus. MSI WIND could try grabbing 10.9 and modding it, adding
> more device ids.
>
> On Oct 5, 7:05 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It involves the device-id, the device-id for any ATI device also has a
> > vendor id, and thats what prevents the reference drivers from being
> > installed.
>
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Yeah when I try to install that 10.8 version it says: You can't
> > > install ATI Catalyst because your computer contains incompatible
> > > hardware/software. The version of your graphic adapter isn't
> > > supported, please contact your manufracturer to update your drivers.
>
> > > What can I do?
>
> > > On 5 okt, 19:56, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Well I'm not sure, Driver Genius found the 10.8 Ati Catalyst for me...
> > >> Also didn't know 10.9 Wasn't notebook compatible! But maybe this is
> > >> the point,
> > >> Ati Catalyst 10.8:
> > >> The following notebooks are not supported in this release:
> > >> ■ Sony VAIO notebooks (please check with your notebook OEM for driver
> > >> support for these notebooks)
>
> > >> Very strange, isn't it about the specific graphic card? Because I
> > >> reinstalled windows 7 and there is nothing left of any sony software
> > >> as far I'm concerned?
>
> > >> On 4 okt, 16:25, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > Are you sure? I never heard of any problems of windows update's
> > >> > drivers running better than the official catalyst drivers. Are you
> > >> > sure that you downloaded the notebook version and not the desktop 
> > >> > lolhttp://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/windows/Pages/radeonmob_win7-32...
>
> > >> > 10.8 is the latest offical mobile driver version
>
> > >> > On Oct 4, 5:18 am, MSI WIND <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > Guys, Something strange is going on... The ATI 5650 driver I get from
> > >> > > Windows Update (released january 2010, can't see what catalyst 
> > >> > > version
> > >> > > or anything) performs much better than ATI Catalyst 10.8 and 10.9
> > >> > > (when I install 10.9 I can't see it's installed, ccc still says
> > >> > > Catalyst version 10.8).. What can be the problem? Doesn't these
> > >> > > catalyst versions support the 5650? Do I install them the wrong way?
> > >> > > Please help me out!
>
> > >> > > On 1 okt, 01:20, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > Well, I do like how you run things, spoken like a hardcore nvidia
> > >> > > > tuner ;) I like to run prime for 24 to 48 hours to be really sure,
> > >> > > > check memory modules, fans being at least at 60%, etc. Though I 
> > >> > > > only
> > >> > > > OC to the hw limit months after my first OC. The past taught me a 
> > >> > > > few
> > >> > > > things far too well :S
>
> > >> > > > On Oct 1, 12:11 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > well, try and OC it till it crash, set the clocks 20MHz before 
> > >> > > > > the crash
> > >> > > > > value...no. 1 rules of OC ing..fan speed crank high, and see how 
> > >> > > > > much power
> > >> > > > > does it draw..furmark for at least 12 hours for 
> > >> > > > > reliability..with GPU stress
> > >> > > > > setting..oh dont forget to shut down the fan at see how long it 
> > >> > > > > can run till
> > >> > > > > it shuts down on itself (emergency maintanence mode) test to 
> > >> > > > > seee where is
> > >> > > > > the GPU capable on shutting down to prevent further damage..and 
> > >> > > > > the list
> > >> > > > > goes on..bla3x..^^ not so hellish isnt it?
>
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:06 AM, tribaljet 
> > >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > What hellish experiment...?
>
> > >> > > > > > On Oct 1, 12:05 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > wtf, two??
> > >> > > > > > > lol, just did some furry donots...lol...my 5670 maxed at 
> > >> > > > > > > 55C..kinda
> > >> > > > > > > good...since i go from 790MHz standard to 840MHz lol,,, i 
> > >> > > > > > > would never
> > >> > > > > > want
> > >> > > > > > > to test that oftenly...
> > >> > > > > > > about nvidias...yup, i agree, but since budget hated me, so 
> > >> > > > > > > yeah, this
> > >> > > > > > 5670
> > >> > > > > > > is more than enough for my needs ^^ but i admit that i 
> > >> > > > > > > wanted to test the
> > >> > > > > > > hell out of the fermi based chips with my hellish 
> > >> > > > > > > experiment..^^
>
> > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:02 AM, tribaljet 
> > >> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > LOL :)) Some guy even created an even more hardcore test, 
> > >> > > > > > > > with TWO
> > >> > > > > > > > furry donuts :) Curiously, 4650 and 4670 are more 
> > >> > > > > > > > resistant to the
> > >> > > > > > > > donuts since they are newer revised chipsets, while 4870 
> > >> > > > > > > > was an early
> > >> > > > > > > > product that couldn't handle the voltage variations.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 11:57 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> 
> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > lol, agreed...but since the 4670 are from Gigabyte, it 
> > >> > > > > > > > > sucks bad, and
> > >> > > > > > i
> > >> > > > > > > > was
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrong on planning budget over reliability...since i have 
> > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > Sapphire, i
> > >> > > > > > > > get
> > >> > > > > > > > > a larger headroom for OCing and still maintain 
> > >> > > > > > > > > temperature....owh and
> > >> > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > > > > MSI WIND, it is advisable to not OC ing for your first 
> > >> > > > > > > > > ATI hardware
> > >> > > > > > (plus
> > >> > > > > > > > > it's alaptop)...lol, unless if u have spare hardware to 
> > >> > > > > > > > > spare, dont
> > >> > > > > > > > > OC..rule one...
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > yeah, LMAO, those furry donuts gives me the chill that 
> > >> > > > > > > > > they can burn
> > >> > > > > > my
> > >> > > > > > > > > 4670...just with a mind blowing 3 minutes of stability
> > >> > > > > > test...lol...which
> > >> > > > > > > > > reminds me, i never did the "furry donut from hell 
> > >> > > > > > > > > tests" on my
> > >> > > > > > > > 5670,,gonna
> > >> > > > > > > > > do it ASAP...lol...
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:51 AM, tribaljet 
> > >> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ah, another reason why nvidias rock ;P Good overclock 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > headroom,
> > >> > > > > > best
> > >> > > > > > > > > > drivers from all vendors (though could still be much 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > improved),
> > >> > > > > > both
> > >> > > > > > > > > > stock and mod drivers are stable and high performing, 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > and they
> > >> > > > > > usually
> > >> > > > > > > > > > last longer since they never had factory hardware 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > bugs, like the
> > >> > > > > > 4870
> > >> > > > > > > > > > that ALWAYS bsod a system if you ran a furry donut for 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > more than 2
> > >> > > > > > > > > > secs ;PPP
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I had a talk with hussam about the exact same thing, 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > in which all
> > >> > > > > > ati
> > >> > > > > > > > > > users I know all run stock drivers with either atitool 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > or rivatuner
> > >> > > > > > :)
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 11:46 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > wll, having an ATI hardware myself for the first 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > time, i too
> > >> > > > > > learned
> > >> > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > hard way...first with the 4670, OCed it with just 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > 30MHz increment
> > >> > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > boom
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > it burned, never knew it would be soo weak..lol....i 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > did many of
> > >> > > > > > my
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > experiment on that 4670 card the same as i 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > experiment with my
> > >> > > > > > 950,
> > >> > > > > > > > minus
> > >> > > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > OC...guess my 950 really stands up from the 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > 4670...lol...and DNA
> > >> > > > > > isnt
> > >> > > > > > > > > > good
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > at all for some systems...instead stock driver with 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > RivaRuner
> > >> > > > > > works
> > >> > > > > > > > best
> > >> > > > > > > > > > but
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > for power users only ^^
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > now the 4670 have been striped and become my 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > paperweight...got a
> > >> > > > > > > > nicve
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sapphire 5670, OC it a bit (recommended this brand 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > reliability)
> > >> > > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > tweak some minor setting like set Catalyst AI to 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > standard
> > >> > > > > > (advance
> > >> > > > > > > > just
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > gives me stutters) and etc....oh and catalyst 10.9 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > seem great at
> > >> > > > > > > > last...i
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > didnt try 10.7 up to 10.8..but i updated to 10.9 and 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > it is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > recommended...lol, mind me, i like to be a end user 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > sometimes,
> > >> > > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > not a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > power user ^^
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Espionage724 <
> > >> > > > > > [email protected]
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > That sux... didn't think the drivers would cause 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > that many
> > >> > > > > > issues
> > >> > > > > > > > for u
> > >> > > > > > > > > > :(
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:43 PM, MSI WIND <
> > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok I have to learn it the hard way performance 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > is even
> > >> > > > > > worse...
> > >> > > > > > > > This
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > is going to be a reinstall..
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Acer TravelMate 2480
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz   
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > RAM: 2GB DDR2
> > >> > > > > > > > 333Mhz
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >Laptop:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Acer Aspire
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04- Tekst uit 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -...
>
> meer lezen »

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to