I know for a fact that atom might be, in a very sunny day, slightly faster than my calculator, and that's if I don't turn it on :P The best way for people to understand what I mean is to have 2 computers with exactly the same specs, but one has a celeron and the other has a full grown intel cpu, even with the same clock, fsb and caches. Then you tell me what's the performance difference, and you will understand why I only had one celeron in my life, for not knowing.
On Oct 28, 12:17 pm, Namige <[email protected]> wrote: > I heard the intel atom is only 2x better than the Apple a4 chip. That > is very bad indeed > > On Oct 28, 12:24 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The biggest curse of Intel was creating Celeron, and when I thought > > nothing worse could ever come to light, they make an even weaker joke > > of a cpu, known as Atom. I'm sorry Kufa, but you have a very VERY bad > > cpu. The only portable computer with the size of a netbook, that can > > actually perform acceptably, costs more than a regular laptop. > > > On Oct 28, 12:22 am, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > pretty much anything with an Atom CPU is a netbook, because they are > > > useless > > > for anything else. > > > > THEfog > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
