You clearly don't know where MAD is going, ok? That's laughable. I
have 2GB which is an incredibly low amount for what I do, and 1GB is
only acceptable for primitive OSes like xp.

On Nov 10, 6:55 pm, Namige <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have 1GB and I rarely run into problems although I sometimes wish I
> had more RAM when running games.
>
> And yeah, it's sort of like saying what can 8 Billion dollars do for
> you that 4 Billion Dollars can't?
>
> On Nov 10, 6:20 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 6GB is enough for most users. The whole new kernel philosophy is to
> > use as much resources available as possible to increase system
> > performance and responsiveness. Large amounts of ram (6GB+) are for
> > people who work on their computers, not play. Also, most people seem
> > to forget that the more ram a computer has, more it will crash. 4GB is
> > more than enough for the vanilla user, but I'm guessing you'll be fine
> > with 6, or 8 if you're so itching to get that amount. But make no
> > mistakes, unless you open the memory limits of certain apps, you can
> > easily manage by with 4GB.
>
> > On Nov 10, 5:59 pm, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > More simple:
>
> > > If a system running hard and dosent use more than the 4GB Available
> > > RAM upgrading to 8GB will improve the perfomance although it wont use
> > > more than 4GB?
>
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to