ah that was my bad (or chrome's bad), I clicked the link and it had http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af207/boocomban/moh2010.png[/IMG] (note the [/IMG] at the end)
But wow thats a huge SS logo :p On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Kiki <[email protected]> wrote: > http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af207/boocomban/moh2010.png > > the image is still there, but somehow the thread separate the address > into > http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/ > and > af207/boocomban/moh2010.png > > anyway, for me, it's not a "believe it or not" problem... > I never doubt anyone for claiming that they can make the games (any > kind of it) playable in such little resolution. > > I myself can also make my games played in as low resolution as > possible (or even better if they allow me to have custom size, so I > can have smaller window size than the "smallest formal window size" > given by the game system) if I want to. > > ============================================== > ~if the game allow such things, then so be it~ > ============================================== > > rather than "believe it or not", I'd rather want to know if it's > "enjoyable enough or not" to have a modern PC shooting game converted > to a "hanheld size and resolution" game > > > On Jan 4, 8:26 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> image haz been removed or moved ;p >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
