Minecraft fps= around 20. Yeah, it will lag when there're a lot of monsters. Intel P4 HT, with 2 GB memory and Intel G945 ;)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait, you're mixing things up. What that guy has is the igp next to > 4500, Intel HD 1000. And it's still terrible. Integrated, you see? ;) > Having 3x as much OpenGL extensions does show results, for you that > is :)) > > My minecraft ran at 15-18, with quite the cpu usage. > > On 7 Fev, 07:48, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > My friend with Intel HD graphics said that the game runs terrible for > > him, even at lowest settings. > > > > This game is OpenGL + Java, so thats probably why the FPS is low, but > > in a comparison with these specs: > > > > Radeon HD 3200 > > AMD Dual Core 2.2GHz > > 3GB RAM > > WIn7 x64 with x64 Java (server) VM > > > > vs > > > > Intel HD 4500 Graphics > > Intel i3 or i5 (idk, its a quad core 2. something though) > > 4GB RAM > > Win7 x86 with x86 Java JRE VM > > > > The first computer gets 30+ FPS in most places whereas the 2nd > > computer (as better as the CPU and 1GB more RAM is) gets about 10 FPS > > at most. Even the Intel graphics card got a higher WEI score then the > > Radeon though. > > > > Since Intel is known to not have good OpenGL at all, I believe this > > may be the cause of it. But maybe it's how his computer is configured > > or something. > > > > So has anyone else tried MC? > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
