define"graphics intensive" abhishek may be cpu can be of little help but it is of little significance also playing graphics intensive games on atom 1.66 ghz make no sense until if u have an integrated chip like ati raedon hd 6310 even though it is a low end chip but u can atlest play some of the "graphics intensive "games in HD. it also depends on core and shader speed of the card.playing games on swiftshader can run the game but also put an hard work on ur cpu withut even seeing the real graphics whic the game can deliver as i say in swiftshader u have to sacrifice graphics for performance but all depends on ur satisfaction.but anyway i would like to thank rajan for his nice work and giving us information.
On May 5, 10:05 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: > Define 'explanatory' > And CPU may not provide a bigger punch, but it definitely helps. Try playing > a graphics intensive game in 1.66 Gig Atom vs even an ancient 2.4 gig P4. > You'll know the difference ;) > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:14 PM, amarta rakshit <[email protected]> wrote: > > cpu may not be the explanatory proof depends on games as such above games > > may be alitlle faster on his cpu but have to do the same sacrifice i.e. > > graphics > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Jose Villegas (MADBEAST) < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Rajan CRYSIS is already playable on the 950 it runs over 20 FPS on > >> lowest settings and ive seen it run very very welll one of the most > >> impressive achivments of this group. > > >> guys, probably when he says MEDIUM he actually means MEDIUM SETTINGS, > >> LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH settings in all of the cases SW 3.0 LAGS so i assume > >> he managed to run it on MED settings on the same low FPS as the > >> others.. > > >> -- > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
