Ok. I would appreciate quite a bit to see some proof, as your performance claims are reaching way too far. But you still haven't shared what registry changes you did.
On May 19, 12:09 am, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for late reply I was uploading a video to gmagaming. > > Actually no I'm pretty dead serious but I removed the game long time > ago because I got bored of it. If anything, To show you some proof, > I'll try downloading it again. > > On May 18, 3:15 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry if I LOL too hard. > > > While NFS:MW is by no means a pc specs killer by any measure > > (currently, at least), I've seen it using up a lot of processing power > > from high end SM3.0 hardware, so don't give me that bs that you can > > run the game at your native res with all settings at high. > > > It seriously sounds like you're trolling. > > > On May 18, 11:11 pm, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thats weird. I played NFS: Most Wanted on Windows 7 1280x800 > > > everything high just fine on gma 950. > > > > My specs: > > > Intel Core 2 Duo T2050 > > > Ram: 1GB > > > Graphics Card: GMA 950 modded to Sherry Driver 1.2 by Angelictears of > > > course > > > Video Ram: 256mb > > > > Maybe when I did that registry patch on my NFS:MS, It fixed my crash > > > and smoother performance? > > > > On May 18, 11:15 am, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I used to get quite bad performance on nfs mw when using windows 7, > > > > specially when turning visual treatment to high. The best way I've > > > > seen that works is by using the Graphics Optimizer tool Angelic spoke > > > > about, disabling motion blur, and suddenly the low visual treatment > > > > settings have the same look as the regular high settings, without that > > > > gloomy blue tint over the screen, and nice performance when running at > > > > 800x600 with near minimum settings. -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
