On 22/11/2018 10:03, Dmitriy Purgin wrote:
The ranges-v3 library is fine and usable, but by using it in a customer project one has to consider additional dependencies, licenses, portability, maintainability, correctness of the library and its long-term support. The authors state themselves that the library is experimental and subject to change. One of the reasons Qt is so successful is that "it has it all", it's well documented, it generally can be seen as a single dependency, and you generally expect good quality and portability between supported platforms.
As much as I like Qt, I would trust the code quality of ranges-v3 much more than Qt's. Never had "project-threathening" bugs with ranges-v3, unlike Qt.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
