I've used this for desktop style (before they tied it to other KDE libs - looking at you, ExtraCmakeModules) : https://github.com/KDE/qqc2-desktop-style
It works fine for me (though you have to mingle a bit with the font settings to get the exact same text rendering than on QWidget in my experience) On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:06 AM Dimitar Dobrev via Interest < [email protected]> wrote: > This e-mail is a better version of the comments I've left > <https://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/12/06/qt-5-12-lts-released/>. > > The release notes for Qt 5.12 <https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.12> > worry me quite a little. They say that Qt Quick 1 is deprecated. There's a > single but key reason this is extremely bad news. And this reason is the > lack of native styles in Qt Quick 2. This alone renders Qt Quick 2 useless > for building decent desktop applications. This in turn means our only > option remains Qt Widgets - a piece of technology which is like a horse > carriage. Good for its time but useless in the era of automobiles. The very > notion of suggesting that for desktop development in 2018 we would be > deprived of a simple declarative language for GUI, a flexible scripting > language to match, GPU-based optimizations and all other wonderful features > Qt Quick has to offer - is ridiculous at best. If it's true that Qt Quick 1 > is deprecated and Qt Quick 2 won't get native styles any time soon, this > simply means Qt has severely regressed in its offerings to developers. > > In addition, I have tracked Qt Quick from its very beginning in 2010 and I > clearly remember you, the Qt developers, advertised Qt Quick as the new > generation of tools and technologies for building graphical user > interfaces. You said Qt Widgets was not (yet) deprecated but fully finished > and would receive few new features and basic optimizations. I hope you will > spare me effort of quotations in support of that above because I think such > actions would be rather ugly. You know what I'm talking about. I see this > as an additional problem to the one described in my first paragraph. You > have made a promise and repeated that promise for years. If Qt Quick 1 is > no more and so are native styles, there's unfortunately one conclusion - > that you have reneged on this promise. > > I am asking of the entire community of developers and management of Qt - > please prove me wrong. Please assure me I'm overreacting. Please tell me Qt > Quick 2 is going to get native styles so that we have the outstanding Qt > Quick 2 for the desktop again. > > > Best regards, > > Dimitar Dobrev > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
