(Reposting as per the wishes of OP, sorry for the *déjà-vu*) I've used this for desktop style (before they tied it to other KDE libs - looking at you, ExtraCmakeModules) : https://github.com/KDE/qqc2-desktop-style
It works fine for me (though you have to mingle a bit with the font settings to get the exact same text rendering than on QWidget in my experience) ------- Jean-Michaël Celerier http://www.jcelerier.name On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:21 AM Dimitar Dobrev via Interest < [email protected]> wrote: > Please disregard my previous e-mail, actually, delete it if possible. I > mean "Qt Quick Controls 1" rather than "Qt Quick 1". > > > This e-mail is a better version of the comments I've left > <https://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/12/06/qt-5-12-lts-released/>. > > The release notes for Qt 5.12 <https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.12> > worry me quite a little. They say that Qt Quick Controls 1 is deprecated. > There's a single but key reason this is extremely bad news. And this reason > is the lack of native styles in Qt Quick Controls 2. This alone renders Qt > Quick Controls 2 useless for building decent desktop applications. This in > turn means our only option remains Qt Widgets - a piece of technology which > is like a horse carriage. Good for its time but useless in the era of > automobiles. The very notion of suggesting that for desktop development in > 2018 we would be deprived of a simple declarative language for GUI, a > flexible scripting language to match, GPU-based optimizations and all other > wonderful features Qt Quick has to offer - is ridiculous at best. If it's > true that Qt Quick Controls 1 is deprecated and Qt Quick Controls 2 won't > get native styles any time soon, this simply means Qt has severely > regressed in its offerings to developers. > > In addition, I have tracked Qt Quick from its very beginning in 2010 and I > clearly remember you, the Qt developers, advertised Qt Quick as the new > generation of tools and technologies for building graphical user > interfaces. You said Qt Widgets was not (yet) deprecated but fully finished > and would receive few new features and basic optimizations. I hope you will > spare me effort of quotations in support of that above because I think such > actions would be rather ugly. You know what I'm talking about. I see this > as an additional problem to the one described in my first paragraph. You > have made a promise and repeated that promise for years. If Qt Quick > Controls 1 is no more and so are native styles, there's unfortunately one > conclusion - that you have reneged on this promise. > > I am asking of the entire community of developers and management of Qt - > please prove me wrong. Please assure me I'm overreacting. Please tell me Qt > Quick Controls 2 is going to get native styles so that we have the > outstanding Qt Quick Controls 2 for the desktop again. > > > Best regards, > > Dimitar Dobrev > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
