On 10.12.18 21:22, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > I'd like to see it before I believe it - for instance I know that at > least on my software, using a QOpenGLViewport-backed QGraphicsView is > quite slower and more laggy than a CPU-rendered one, consistently, on > macOS, windows and linux (and I have a fairly good GPU). You seem to have researched the topic a little more so I'm not going to argue any more. But my point stays: worse comes to worst, it's entirely unjustified to keep a modern framework without a native look while suggesting an 20-year old replacement, just because it might perform suboptimally on the few cards with no hardware acceleration. > And QQC 2 has animations by default - I invite you to go to QtCreator > and press File / New project / Qt application / Qt Quick Application > - Swipe and interact with it. I did. The only animation is in the swipe view, where the very name of the component suggests an animation. This swipe view is not obligatory but simply a part of the project template. One is free to use another template or replace the swipe view with a regular tab view. > Also, no tree view -> no go for a *lot* of technical apps. An excellent point. They did add a tree view at one point but I've just confirmed it was for QQC1 only. So in addition to a native look in QQC2 we also need a tree view (with a native look :) ).
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
