On 15 June 2012 15:39, Rui Maciel <rui.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/15/2012 03:13 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >>> > But it's standard and it is C++. >> But (I think) the point was: what should have we used for the last >> 10-15 years of QString? > > I could've been a bit clearer in my initial post, but I intended to know > if there was currently any reason that justified having QString around > instead of simply using what's already included in C++'s standard library.
Besides all the technical reasons given? Backwards compatibility to existing code-bases. There's millions upon millions of lines of Qt code out there using QString, do you want to tell everyone that to port to Qt5 they must use C++11 and change all their code to use std_string? John. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
