> > It's possible to, simplify that process ? I have no problem to sign a
> > disclaimer like "I wrote that code, but I give all the rights to i.e.
> > digia/Kdab/<write_here_your_company>" and then send my patches to
> > someone in that company that evaluates them and pushes it to gerrit in
> > behalf of me.
>
> Let's consider imaginary situation when some party claims that Qt contains
> copyrighted code, and points to code lines coming from your patches. Who
> should be charged? Persons who submitted your patch, because git blame shows
> them.
Sure. Note that I've said "I sign a disclaimer saying I'VE wrote that
code...blah, blah". Blames to me ( a simple note on commit, and solved
). I'm not a lawyer, so perhaps I'm absolutely wrong, but we can always
find a simple solution for this case.
P.S. : I've just seen a "Tools->Git->Gerrit..." option in QtCreator. Is
that a try to integrate gerrit interaction with QtCreator ? It could be
a great solution to simple patches as ours...
Jordi.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
