Den 19-04-2013 12:29, Rainer Wiesenfarth skrev: > Am 19.04.2013 11:25, schrieb Bo Thorsen: >> Sounds to me like you want to switch to cmake instead. That has a lot >> better support for dependencies between subprojects than qmake. And for >> a project of this size, I would expect you have some fancy build stuff >> in there as well, and qmake is usually too simple for it. > > Hi Bo, > > well, I know about cmake, but was going for something less cryptic... :-) > > We have some fancy build stuff (f2c, versioning, ...), but I was hoping > to get it done with qmake, _because_ it is simple.
I know, but when you have a complicated build process, a simple tool just doesn't cut it. > Probably I have to dig through "QMake Variables" and "QMake Functions" > to find the features I need. I'll bet you that you won't be able to, unfortunately. On the bright side: Once you have a good cmake build in place, you will have the visual studio build done with the same system as Linux. Having two different build systems is *not* a good idea. Bo. -- Bo Thorsen, European Qt Manager, Integrated Computer Solutions ICS - Delivering World-Class Applications for Embedded & Mobile Devices http://ics.com/services _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest