Hi, On 30.07.2015 11:31, Tony Rietwyk wrote: > Igor wrote: > >> Because in Qt 4 QThread::sleep is protected. > You can unprotect it by deriving your own class from QThread and making > whichever static methods public! As long as you are aware of the pitfalls > (don't sleep in main thread, etc.), and much easier than messing with locks > just to gain access to sleep.
Thank you guys for your answers. You are right and I know about all this approaches. But I have to say that sleep() needed in object that doesn't know anything about his thread. And my question is just theoretical: is this approach good or such sleep() implementation not so good and why? I.e. will such sleep() release processor's time for another thread or not? -- Best Regards, Igor Mironchik. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
