> On 06 Jul 2016, at 19:41, Uwe Rathmann <uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:58:48 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> >> So what you want isn't QWidget with OpenGL support. We've proven it >> won't work. What you want is a powerful, Scene Graph-based set of >> widgets with native look and feel (that is Qt Quick Controls). >> >> You're probably also asking for a C++ API instead of a QML one. > > And this is exactly what I'm currently trying to do - creating a set of > Quick controls offering full featured C++ and QML APIs. > > Our main motivation is the well known instantiation problem of QML, that > is totally dominating the overall performance of our user interface. As > most of our QML code is application code, having a C++ API for the > controls is mandatory to significantly limit the amount of QML.
Interesting choice. I would have done the exact opposite. Application logic in C++ and UI declaration in QML. Declaring fluid animated UIs in QML is a joy, writing animations in C++ is not so. -- J-P Nurmi _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
