Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev:
29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" <[email protected]>:
Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev:
Hello,
We use Qt under LGPL license.
We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited
connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then.
What do we must to do next to obey the license terms?
Publish the changes somewhere?
We ended up shipping the actual patches we made in the installer,
putting them in a separate directory together and referencing them from
the licences section in our about box. We kept around the Qt sources for
the Qt we shipped with the product in the office in case anyone would
ever ask for them (nobody ever did, of course).
Looks like a violation of LGPL. Section 6 requires you to provide
_complete_ source code or written offer to do so.
We did offer, in the license text in the about screen. We didn't ship
the complete Qt sources with the product though, but we kept them them
around in case anyone would ever ask. Same for some other libs we used
and patched by the way. In my non-lawyer opinion, that is not an LGPL
violation.
André
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
