Kai Koehne <[email protected]> wrote in news:db6pr0201mb2135167cdab4996d782bf16d98...@db6pr0201mb2135.eurprd02.pr od.outlook.com:
>> The reason for wanting everything to be signed is that Windows >> Defender may flag unsigned executables as possible malware. > > If this does help with the false virus scanner positives this is very > interesting, indeed. I know that signing installers helps; I'm not sure if signing DLLs helps or not. Looking forward, I wouldn't be surprised to see malware scanners looking for digital signatures if they aren't doing it now. On the other hand, looking at a few random Microsoft DLLs under Windows 10, I see that they are not signed. >> Is there any chance that Qt might start signing its DLLs? > I don't think there are immediate plans to do this. Maybe you can file a > suggestion? Created suggestion: QTBUG-57542 _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
