Em sexta-feira, 30 de dezembro de 2016, às 11:29:11 BRST, Philippe escreveu:
> > How is it ia win for std::vector to achieve next year what QVector has
> > done
> > for the past 7 or 8?
> 
> Not to mention we are likely far away from the time C++17 becomes a
> requirement to use or build Qt.

But that doesn't stop you from using it in your own projects much earlier, of 
course.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to