On 2 September 2017 at 12:15, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, 1 September 2017 16:42:08 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> doc.qt.io says that for Qt 5.9, the supported platform contains: >> Linux 32/64-bit: GCC 4.8, GCC 4.9, GCC 5.3 >> >> According to your gcc bug report, the bug was introduced in gcc 5.1 >> but has never been fixed (?) > > Correct. We just ignore the failure. There's nothing we can do about it.
Really? How do you cope in CI? You don't build for linux-32 anymore? > >> So if Qt supports gcc 5.3, then it supports gcc with this bug? > > Yes. > >> (K)Ubuntu-17.04 ships with gcc 6.3 and Qt-5.7, surely their 32 bits OS >> version doesn't ship with a broken QAtomicInteger... >> >> Any clue on how I can get around this bug? > > You cannot. Just ignore this failure. Scary, i then cannot run the tests about Qt's atomic integer solutions! Does QAtomicInteger<quint64> works safely with Qt 5.6 on a linux 32 bits box with gcc > 5.1? Should i use QAtomicInteger<quint64> on 64bits and QAtomicInteger<quint32> on 32 bits? If you or I cannot build and so cannot run QAtomicInteger's test suites, then how do you or how do I know it works as adverstised? Thanks, Chris > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
