On Saturday November 11 2017 17:47:14 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >Well, LTO and missing symbols go hand in hand, you should be ready to deal >with such errors.
That shouldn't be the case IMHO, and most of the time it isn't at least not when building Qt. >What is your reason to use LTO? Can you avoid using it? In this case it's mostly to obtain the most compact build possible, esp. since I'm using a static build of libQtHelp . On Linux the size difference is considerable for the assistant executable (a factor 2-3 IIRC). It's not a great deal otherwise, just something I like to understand. R. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
