Hi, On Thu, November 30, 2017 16:49, Jason H wrote: > I don't think you can say that Qt is not real-time. That's more of a > kernel issue than a software library issue.
On Thu, November 30, 2017 17:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Actually, Qt is ported to real-time operating systems, such as QNX and > Integrity This is a common misconception. Realtime is not some magic forest that will make everything realtime as soon as you enter it. All layers of hard- and software have to be realtime in order for the result to be considered realtime too. A simple use of new or malloc can destroy your realtime guarantees because memory allocation is not fully deterministic. Luckily we are talking about "soft" realtime with multimedia applications where the occasional deviation is not catastrophic and will likely not even be noticed by the users. Just make sure: a) all threads handling time and media are scheduled as realtime threads b) if at all possible make it ONE thread with all the critical stuff c) keep the code in that critical thread as short and fast as possible d) reduce dynamic object allocations during runtime to the absolute minimum - if possible allocate everything you need before you start e) try to work lock free (otherwise you'll have regular priority inversions; those are real fun!) Konrad _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
