Thanks, because the web-page of Qt is confusing. At this page there is written next to Qt Web Engine (under LGPL only). Therefore I concluded that the rest is GPL.
-----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annu...@yandex.ru] Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:20 To: Walter Stefan <stefan.wal...@lisec.com>; interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine 29.01.2018, 17:08, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.wal...@lisec.com>: > Thanks for the quick response. > > Is there a web-link that supports this, or where can I seen the licenses to > the Qt modules? https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/ http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebkit.git/tree/LICENSE.LGPLv21 > > Best Regards, > Stefan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annu...@yandex.ru] > Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:05 > To: Walter Stefan <stefan.wal...@lisec.com>; interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine > > 29.01.2018, 16:58, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.wal...@lisec.com>: >> Hi, >> >> I’ve done some research about QWebView and QWebEngine and came to the >> following conclusion: >> >> QWebView is under GPL and uses internally WebKit. > > Incorrect. QtWebKit code is LGPL+BSD. > >> QWebEngine is under LGPL and uses internally Chromium. >> >> Please let me know if this is correct, because I don’t want to disclose my >> source and that would mean I have to use QWebEngine. >> >> Is there beside the license other limitations to be aware of? >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> >> Stefan >> , >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
