On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 06:53:26 PDT Roland Hughes wrote: > What I'm trying to tell you is there was and still is a legitimate > reason to have a QDataStream which can write big-endian. Don't just rip > it out. Make it some kind of settable boolean flag in the class. There > is no way to know just how many of these things are still out there and > are still being developed. Most were in the world of defense > contractor/military
I never claimed it isn't. In fact, there is a flag to set the endianness. When I said "most machines are little-endian", I was referring to machines Qt runs on and, therefore, would use QDataStream. The fact that the default is big endian is short-sighted. It should default to little-endian. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
