Can't... let.. this... go... without a link... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNBFux0ENKc
My sincerest appologies.
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 10:32 AM
From: "Mike Chinander" <[email protected]>
To: "interestqt-project.org" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 79, Issue 20
From: "Mike Chinander" <[email protected]>
To: "interestqt-project.org" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 79, Issue 20
Has the Superconducting Super Collider been revived?
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interestOn Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Roland Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
Read up on seismic testing or stuff happening with the Super Colliding Super Conductor. In the case of SCSC many thousands of disposable chip "sensors" running an application to pick up one or a few certain readings are streaming that stuff back to the only box which can handle them, big iron. IBM was never the fastest computationally, but when it comes to data throughput to/from disk they are a 14" city water main and their nearest competitor is happy the one day per week they achieve being a fire hose.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
