On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:03 AM René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Last time I asked the advice was still not to bother with trying to build 
> (all of) Qt with clang on Linux. Is that still the case or is it now safe to 
> use clang (5 or 6)?

Can you share a link to a LLVM or Qt bug report where you're expecting
improvements ? We can't discuss it without knowing which problems
we're addressing.

I only know of the LTO problem when building Qt with clang (closed as
WONTFIX in both Qt and Clang trackers IIRC)

Regards,
Sergio
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to