On 9/16/19 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Il 14/09/19 14:53, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Please keep in mind there is no version of SSL which is secure.
Do you have any reference/source for this (quite extraordinary) claim?
You know, for you it wouldn't matter. It would be a link and you are
incapable of actually clicking then reading anything which doesn't
support your opinion. There are numerous packages on the market which
cut through SSL like a hot knife through butter. "60 Minutes" did a
piece on the best known and most financially successful one but some
sources say there are around a dozen packages playing at the same level.
Here's the link which was provided before and I'm sure you didn't bother
to follow prior to responding.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/interview-with-ceo-of-nso-group-spyware-maker-fighting-terror-khashoggi-murder-and-saudi-arabia-60-minutes-2019-08-18/
Please also keep in mind the big systems are moving towards a TCP/IP
software appliance within the OS. No application will be able to create
or open a port. No application will be able to choose/define the
transport layer security. They will open a logical-resource-handle
provided by the OS and the systems manager will configure if that
resource is I, O, or I/O as well as what the transport level protocols
are. Eventually (within 5 years of adoption) this will be forced out
into the IoT and lesser devices world as well.
So long for the "backward compatibility is paramount" promise then.
That would only be for the hokey code which came from the *nix world.
For the code which didn't come from a world that did it wrong it is 100%
backwardly compatible because that is exactly how we did network
communications. In other words all of the software developed _on_ those
platforms and _for_ those platforms will be fine. What will be going
away are the *nix TCP/IP library functions of C/C++ because they are a
massive security nightmare. There was a time when marketing bowed to the
pressure from companies which only wanted "free" software on their
million plus dollar platform, but that has lead to security catastrophe
after security catastrophe. Now they are in the process of locking them
back down and just letting people whine an snivel about *nix package not
being available on the platform.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
