On Thursday, 17 October 2019 06:42:27 PDT d3fault wrote:
> This is excellent news. I hope those contributors continue to resist
> the change to GPLv3. As a developer who releases his code under an
> LGPLv3-like license, all of Qt's GPLv3/Commercial modules are useless
> to me.

Please note that there's no such thing as "resist change from LGPLv3 to 
GPLv3". The licence allows that. Anyone can take the content, drop the "L" 
part and re-publish. The only requirement is to indicate that it's a modified 
version, not identical to upstream's.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel System Software Products



_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to