Hi Thiago, As I wrote a bit earlier, for completely independent projects/products it is fine that one is using commercial and one open-source. This is much more likely to happen in a big corporation than a small company, but possible scenario in both.
Note that these really should not be same or in practice the same - or in any way depending, relating, using etc each other as defined in the license agreement. See licensing FAQ question 2.7 at https://www.qt.io/faq/ and License agreement at https://www.qt.io/terms-conditions/ Yours, Tuukka On 31.3.2020, 14.33, "Interest on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <interest-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: On Monday, 30 March 2020 16:59:11 -03 Elvis Stansvik wrote: > > Please read the commercial license agreement and the licensing FAQ. The > > restriction has nothing to do with open-source licensing. It is about a > > company, who is using a commercially licensed Qt not to use parts of the > > same licensed Qt product under open-source license. If there was no such > > restriction, a company could have a team of 10 developers, but only 1 or > > 2 commercial license for Qt. > Up until now, you've said "same project". Now you are switching to > "company". Please clarify. And don't think of a 10-developer company. Think of a company with 20000 developers, with offices all over the world. If *any* of them buy a commercial licence, does it mean everyone else must stop using the open source Qt? And Qt Creator? How about contributing to Qt open source? Do they have to stop too? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest