On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:19, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:54 AM > > From: "Konstantin Tokarev" <annu...@yandex.ru> > > > > Isn't this done intentionally to promote commercial licenses among open > source users? > > Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to human stupidity. > -Hanlon's razor. > > For me, because there was confusion over this module's license, I > attribute it to that. Which also would be the same result as applying > Occam's razor. >
Well, now we know it was done on purpose: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-87746?focusedCommentId=532011&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-532011 Unfortunately, our marketplace backend does not support distributing > different variants of the modules. If we had the open-source version > available, then there would not be the Marketplace license -based version. > > The reason why Qt PDF is not available in the installer for open-source > users is simply that we wanted to make difference between commercial and > open-source installations. It was intentional, not a bug. > It seems The Qt Company is continuing to show love and appreciation toward the open source users....
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
