On 4/30/21, 7:06 AM, "Lars Knoll" <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote:
If he decides to come back after that I do expect that his emails follow
our CoC and stay on topic for this mailing list. Any further violations will
lead to a permanent ban.
Thanks, Lars, both for the ban and the explanation. Sigh of relief from me.
On 4/30/21, 6:36 AM, "Interest on behalf of Bernhard Lindner"
<interest-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of priv...@bernhard-lindner.de>
wrote:
Of course the underlying intentions must be constructive anyway - which
should be
the main question when considering to ban someone.
Do you think Roland's main intentions are destructive?
What is important is _not_ the intention, but the effect on the community. And
for me, Roland's "contributions" were destructive. Roland looks at Qt through
a lens of embedded safety/regulatory equipment. I get that and do appreciate
the perspective. But he speaks in absolutes.
QML == Awful
Qt == Unstable
New members to the list get the wrong impression when Roland's extreme opinions
aren't pushed back on. You've hit a bad place when the choice is ignoring FUD
vs. fighting a flame-war. People that force that choice don't deserve to be
here.
Regards,
Brett
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
