Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Stephan.
Puzzled: If there is a (new style) singleton theOfficeResourceLoader
(of type XResourceBundleLoader, I assume), there should be no need to
additionally have a (new style) service OfficeResourceLoader (of the
same type).
Argh. "theOfficeResourceLoader" is a typo, originating from the version
version where it was in fact named this way. Today, only
OfficeResourceLoader does exist.
But is OfficeResourceLoader a service or a singleton? (If it is a
singleton, we might want to discuss whether we want to deviate from
existing practice of naming singletons in the OOo API with a "the"
prefix...)
-Stephan
Thanks for reading that attentive :)
Ciao
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
