Tu es rect. Yo pensat que on vell posser usar exemplimen regle -ul- talmen que on vell haver regulari. It es evident que "regulari" es plu international quam *reglari, ma del altri láter "regle" sembla plus international quam "regul".

Den 2020-08-24 kl. 00:52, skrev Marcos Cruz:
In 2020-08-23 20:37, Kjell Rehnström scrit:

Paroles quam nebule vell posser haver li form *neble e *spegle e tande
on ve vell besonar un regle por -ul!
Tande li lingue ne vell haver li international derivates, por exemple
nebulosi (neblosi?), respegular (respeglar?), ínregulari (ínreglari?)...

Occidental esset tre bon pensat!

Apropó, in hispan existe li radic "regla" (=regul) e derivates de it,
quam "reglamento" (=regulament), ma li max mult derivates usa li radic
original: regular (verbe), irregular (adjective), regulación
(substantive), regularizar (verbe)... To eveni anc con altri radicas.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#254): https://groups.io/g/interlingue/message/254
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76365392/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/interlingue/leave/5161842/2010256328/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to