James: Thanks for the note.
--- James P. Ashe wrote: > this one is a long shot, but you can't say i didn't ask... And we promise not to fix it if we don't know it's broke :-) > per-map SMTP settings. > > why? on a multihomed system youd ideally like to have a map for > network 1 send its alerts out network 2 (and vice versa) in case > of outages. maybe a default setting in the main preferences, but > the ability to override in the map preferences. that would > make me happy :D --- end of quote --- We've wondered whether InterMapper should try three ways to send a message, falling back as necessary. For example, InterMapper could attempt a SMTP connection directly with host named in the e-mail address. Failing that, it would attempt to relay through its configured primary SMTP host, then attempt to relay through the back-up SMTP host. (The current implementation skips the first step, and immediately sends to the primary server.) A question for James: Would this three-tiered implementation do what you want? And a question for the list: Would this new three-tiered proposal break current deployments? Thanks! Rich Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dartware, LLC http://www.dartware.com 10 Buck Road, PO Box 130 Telephone: 603-643-2268 Hanover, NH 03755-0130 USA Fax: 603-643-2289 ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
