My box has been flawless. I always test on a non-production box for awhile after a new OS or application release, but at this time, it appears there will be no issues.
Patrick Storr Systems Administration Northwest Internet Services > ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Persiko > Reply To: InterMapper Discussion > Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2003 12:06 PM > To: InterMapper Discussion > Subject: Mac OS X 10.3 "Panther" and Intermapper 4.1: Any Issues? > > Hello- > > Has anyone upgraded their Mac OS X box that runs InterMapper to Panther > and encountered issues? > > Thanks, > Mark > > - Mark C. Persiko, Network Engineer > - IT Division, Boulder Valley School District > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Lieberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:27 AM > To: 'InterMapper Discussion' > Subject: RE: Nagios false down reads > > > We block ICMP 'from' the router to the LAN that supports the network on > which the IM Service is running. At this time I don't log those events > to > syslog. We see no ICMP traffic emanating from the LAN where the service > resides to the router (I do block with two exceptions and log that). The > Nagios device is not shielded from ICMP (though it could and will be as > of > now). We were seeing some high traffic from two customer networks at > about > the same time. We will investigate that. > > Thanks for the suggestion Mel. > > - Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mel Beckman > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:04 AM > To: InterMapper Discussion > Subject: RE: Nagios false down reads > > Mike, > > I've been seeing problems like this in networks that turns out to be > the > Blaster and Nachi virii in their "broadcast" mode -- when they try to > ping > every IP address on the local subnet, which results in massive broadcast > packets on large (e.g. 10.0.0.0/8) subnets. Many routers discard ICMP > packets when faced with so much broadcast traffic. I don't believe > Intermapper will sense the broadcast traffic, because it may not be a > high > bits per second data rate, just a high packets per second. > > Have you put a sniffer on your network to see if you've got a broadcast > flood going on? > > -mel > > >I rarely am watching the screen at the exact moment when the probe is > >reported as down, so I can't tell you the "Reason" from the Satus > Window. > >Here's what I have right now. > > > >The Debug log has nothing for the probe. > > > >The outage log looks like this: > > > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 03:58 PM Cheyenne Temp 29 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 03:58 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 04:01 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 04:01 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 05:30 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 05:30 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 07:20 PM Cheyenne Temp 58 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 07:19 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 07:42 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 07:42 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 07:59 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 07:59 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 09:45 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 09:44 PM > >Mon, Nov 03, 2003 11:13 PM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 11:13 PM > >Tue, Nov 04, 2003 12:00 AM Cheyenne Temp 28 seconds > Mon, > >Nov 03, 2003 11:59 PM > > > > The event log looks like this: > > > >11/03 19:19:33 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 1 hour, 49 minutes, > >2 > >seconds) > >11/03 19:20:31 UP Cheyenne Temp:: (Was down for 58 seconds) > >11/03 19:42:03 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 21 minutes, 32 > seconds) > >11/03 19:42:31 UP Cheyenne Temp:: (Was down for 28 seconds) > >11/03 19:59:03 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 16 minutes, 32 > seconds) > >11/03 19:59:31 UP Cheyenne Temp:: (Was down for 28 seconds) > >11/03 21:44:32 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 1 hour, 45 minutes, > > >1 > >second) > >11/03 21:45:00 UP Cheyenne Temp:: (Was down for 28 seconds) > >11/03 23:13:02 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 1 hour, 28 minutes, > >2 > >seconds) > >11/03 23:13:30 UP Cheyenne Temp:: (Was down for 28 seconds) > >11/03 23:59:32 DOWN Cheyenne Temp:: (Was up for 46 minutes, 2 > >seconds) > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher L. > >Sweeney > >Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:53 AM > >To: InterMapper Discussion > >Subject: Re: Nagios false down reads > > > >At 8:30 AM -0700 11/4/03, Mike Lieberman wrote: > >>Are packets from Nagios devices easily lost, or occasionally not sent, > > >for some reason? > > > > > >We are using a remote temp probe which supports Nagios via IM. The > > >Nagios code seems to work, and the temps are properly read. There is > > > >good open bandwidth between the probe and the IM service, (by a DS3 > >>which during these down events may have under 10% utilization). Never > >>the less we see frequent "down" events. Setting the timeout to a > >>longer > >setting just makes the "Down" > >>longer before the "UP". It doesn't appear to be a delayed packet as > >>much as a missed, unsent or discarded packet. > >> > >>Does anyone have anything else similar happening with Nagios supported > > >>equipment under IM? > >> > > > >What does the status window give as a reason for these down events? > >It would be worth checking the debug log, too, to see if IM is having > >difficulty setting up and executing the Nagios command from time to > time. > > > >-- Christopher > > > >-- > >================================================ > >Christopher L. Sweeney > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://www.dartware.com/ > > > >____________________________________________________________________ > >List archives: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > >To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >____________________________________________________________________ > >List archives: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > >To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
