Bill,
You are wright. I was polling the Cisco 6000 with probe snmp-cisco V2C and
now I changed it in snmp-cisco. The counters are more realistic now.
BUT the is to much difference in de readings of 3.5 and 4.12.
For testing purposes I use now two versions simultaneouslyon a G5. One
version 3.5 PPC IN OS9
and one version 4.12 in 10.3.
For me is this fastpolling mechanism very important because it is very
useful the diagnose problems between servers /clients in a large network.
In this way I can't use Imapper to monitor. I tried to add charts in pdf's
2x 52K for you to compare but the ImapperLISTserver rejected because the
files where to large. I could send them to the Imapper development-team.
Problems 4.12
- difference in the readings of the values of a cisco 6000
- fails the hold the log-settings in a chart!!! When you again open
chart->log-> I get "Untitled Chart1"
- fails to log the information of the chart into a file
with regards Hans Heger RIVM the Netherlands
|---------+------------------------------------>
| | "William W. Fisher" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | e.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | rtware.com> |
| | |
| | |
| | 17-03-2004 17:02 |
| | Please respond to |
| | "InterMapper Discussion" |
| | |
|---------+------------------------------------>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: "InterMapper Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc: Hans Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Re: missing datapoints im 4.12
|
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hans:
On the InterMapper 4.1.2 machine, what is the probe type that
InterMapper is using? One guess is that you might be using a SNMPv2c
based probe, which is going to use the HC counters instead of
Counter32's and that this might account for the difference (?).
Can you please clarify the version numbers also? I am not sure what
you mean by 3.15 -- do you mean 3.5?
Thanks,
Bill Fisher
Dartware, LLC
On Mar 16, 2004, at 11:28 AM, Hans Heger wrote:
> I have notices a problem in the values is data between im 3.15 and 4.12
>
> I'm reading a cisco 6000 fastethernet interface and the utilization
> is
> getting above 1000%!!! ( Yes we are fast in the Netherlands)
> I am polling the same interface at the same time with im3.15 and 4.12.
> The difference you can see in the two pdf files. Bytes /sec
>
> ???????
>
> with regards Hans Heger RIVM
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________________
"Dit bericht en eventuele aangehechte bestanden zijn vertrouwelijk en
uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Ongeautoriseerde verstrekking of
bekendmaking aan en gebruik door anderen zijn niet toegestaan. Als u dit
bericht per vergissing hebt ontvangen wordt u verzocht dit onmiddellijk aan
de afzender te melden en het bericht van uw systemen te verwijderen.
De werkgever van de afzender kan niet garanderen dat de verzonden en/of
ontvangen informatie juist is en aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor
schade die eruit kan voortvloeien."
"This message and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential
information and is solely intended for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized
disclosure or actions taken in reliance on it are forbidden. If you have
received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.
The employer of the sender does not guarantee that the information sent
and/or received is correct and does not accept any liability for damages
related thereto."
____________________________________________________________________
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
