Have just installed 4.3.1b4 running as deamon. It is using between 7 & 15% (compared to 30 -40% of available cpu
People are starting to work with Console, crossing fingers for reliability. Regards, Justyn Phillips VMS Systems Administrator Infomedia Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.infomedia.com.au -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William W. Fisher Sent: Friday, 10 June 2005 12:03 AM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Traditional installation procedures 4.3.1b3 should decrease the base CPU utilization of intermapperd on Mac OS X by a factor of 5 to10, putting daemon in a range less than Traditional. You can download the latest InterMapper beta version from: http://www.intermapper.com/binaries/test.html Regards, Bill Fisher Dartware, LLC On Jun 8, 2005, at 7:55 PM, Justyn Phillips wrote: > My problem with Intermapperd is the amount of CPU consumed. > > Currently running traditional on a 1.8GHz iMac G5, monitoring 529 > devices. This uses 35 - 40 % CPU time. (there are lots of duplication > and poor mapping we have found with the lists from 4.3 - thanks guys - > which we are slowly addressing) > > Running the Daemon used 90%+ CPU leaving nowt for local console. Is > this > normal or have we stuffed something up?? ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
