Is the "vantage point" sort of like parent child? Another question about "vantage point" does that span across multiple maps (when using map probes?)
I looked into the "vantage point" but I don't think that will solve my issue of having the same device (server) on multiple maps. Steve -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szymon Lobocki Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:40 PM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Question about monitoring objects - object linking (same object on several maps) I agree with Tony. Being able to define parent/child acknowledgment relationships as described by Bill would be very useful. Szymon Lobocki, UIUC On 1/11/06, Tony Mumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > While it's not exactly what he was looking for, I do see some value in > creating a hierarchy like you are suggesting. If anything, it would reduce > the multiplicity of alarms that is created by the individual services when a > server goes down. > > Thanks, > > Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William W. Fisher > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:50 PM > To: InterMapper Discussion > Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Question about monitoring objects - object linking > (same object on several maps) > > On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Steven Good wrote: > > > Lets say we have a map called "Email Services" and another map "File > > Services" on these maps are the individual service probes for their > > components, along with the devices/servers. > > > > We have several services that may share the same server. > > > > So email and file_services also share server_A, and we need to take > > server_A down for maintenance. If we has a probe for server_A on both > > maps, we would have to pre-acknowledge it on both maps. > > > > By object linking, I am asking if we acknowledge server_A on the email > > map, that it would also be acknowledged on the file_services map? At > > least that is the way we would like it to work. > > I am assuming that these "object links" would be uni-directional? > That is, if you acknowledge server_A, then email_service_A and > file_service_A would be acknowledged as well, but if you acknowledge > email_service_A, this does not affect server_A or file_service_A. > > To put it another way, the relationship is equivalent to parent/child? > > server_A is the parent. It has two children: email_service_A and > file_service_A. > > Regards, > > Bill Fisher > Dartware, LLC > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
