Hi,
Not for me..
Jakob Peterhänsel
"Be a part of the Love Generation - carry a smile, not a gun."
- JP, May 2006
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: Marook
Phone: +45 29687104
On 01/03/2007, at 9.10, Alain Fontaine wrote:
Hi,
In order to save addresses, we are using /31 network masks on all
our point-to-point links between routers. While not completely
kosher according to the holy RFCs, this practice is fully supported
on many routers.
However, InterMapper does not like this, and half of the interfaces
(those using the upper address) are flagged with :
Address: a.b.c.203 (255.255.255.254)
(a.b.c.203 is the broadcast address for this
subnet!) <- in RED !
This is just a cosmetic glitch, but some people then think that
there must be something wrong with that interface.
My question: would it be a problem for anyone if I would suggest to
Dartware to drop the test for the broadcast address when the mask
is /31.
Thanks.
--
/AF
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
