I would agree. We use hundreds of devices that have multiple T1's or other type connections between them and an option to treat a down link as a down condition would be very beneficial.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Himebaugh Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:57 AM To: Intermapper Talk Subject: [IM-Talk] Link Down - Up/Down or Critical? Should a link going down be treated as a Critical (or a Warning as it is by default), or as a Down condition? With a redundant network, you can have a link go down and routing switch to another path so there's no device down indication. Also, a link down as Critical (or Warning) gets hidden in all the other Critical events such as RX errors or discards. We've upped the critical thresholds so that the only critical notifiier we get is for a link down. We would like a link going down to be treated as a Down Condition with the Down visual alert of a flashing icon and a Down Notifier. Anyone else think a link down should be a higher priority? Maybe the option to treat a link down as Down? ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
