The (throw-together) probe I wrote for the 3750's work if the stack has
1 member or 9.
Cut n' Paste n' Try. Suggestions welcome.
<header>
"type" = "custom-snmp"
"package" = "edu.etsu"
"probe_name" = "snmp.cisco3750"
"human_name" = "Cisco Catalyst 3750"
"version" = "1.0"
"address_type" = "IP, AT"
"port_number" = "161"
</header>
<snmp-device-properties>
pdutype="get-request"
</snmp-device-properties>
<description>
</description>
<parameters>
</parameters>
<snmp-device-variables>
module1, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.1, Default, "module 1 status"
module2, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.2, Default, "module 2 status"
module3, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.3, Default, "module 3 status"
module4, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.4, Default, "module 4 status"
module5, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.5, Default, "module 5 status"
module6, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.6, Default, "module 6 status"
module7, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.7, Default, "module 7 status"
module8, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.8, Default, "module 8 status"
module9, 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10.9, Default, "module 9 status"
stack1a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5180, Default, "module 1, stackport 1
status"
stack1b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5181, Default, "module 1, stackport 2
status"
stack2a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5183, Default, "module 2, stackport 1
status"
stack2b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5184, Default, "module 2, stackport 2
status"
stack3a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5186, Default, "module 3, stackport 1
status"
stack3b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5187, Default, "module 3, stackport 2
status"
stack4a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5189, Default, "module 4, stackport 1
status"
stack4b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5190, Default, "module 4, stackport 2
status"
stack5a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5192, Default, "module 5, stackport 1
status"
stack5b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5193, Default, "module 5, stackport 2
status"
stack6a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5195, Default, "module 6, stackport 1
status"
stack6b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5196, Default, "module 6, stackport 2
status"
stack7a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5198, Default, "module 7, stackport 1
status"
stack7b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5199, Default, "module 7, stackport 2
status"
stack8a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5201, Default, "module 8, stackport 1
status"
stack8b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5202, Default, "module 8, stackport 2
status"
stack9a, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5204, Default, "module 9, stackport 1
status"
stack9b, 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.5205, Default, "module 9, stackport 2
status"
</snmp-device-variables>
<snmp-device-thresholds>
Critical: ${module1} != 2 && "$module1" != "" "problem with stack module
1"
Critical: ${module2} != 2 && "$module2" != "" "problem with stack module
2"
Critical: ${module3} != 2 && "$module3" != "" "problem with stack module
3"
Critical: ${module4} != 2 && "$module4" != "" "problem with stack module
4"
Critical: ${module5} != 2 && "$module5" != "" "problem with stack module
5"
Critical: ${module6} != 2 && "$module6" != "" "problem with stack module
6"
Critical: ${module7} != 2 && "$module7" != "" "problem with stack module
7"
Critical: ${module8} != 2 && "$module8" != "" "problem with stack module
8"
Critical: ${module9} != 2 && "$module9" != "" "problem with stack module
9"
Alarm : ${stack1a} != 1 && "$module2" != "" "problem with stack module
1 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack1b} != 1 && "$module2" != "" "problem with stack module
1 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack2a} != 1 && "$module2" != "" "problem with stack module
2 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack2b} != 1 && "$module2" != "" "problem with stack module
2 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack3a} != 1 && "$module3" != "" "problem with stack module
3 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack3b} != 1 && "$module3" != "" "problem with stack module
3 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack4a} != 1 && "$module4" != "" "problem with stack module
4 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack4b} != 1 && "$module4" != "" "problem with stack module
4 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack5a} != 1 && "$module5" != "" "problem with stack module
5 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack5b} != 1 && "$module5" != "" "problem with stack module
5 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack6a} != 1 && "$module6" != "" "problem with stack module
6 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack6b} != 1 && "$module6" != "" "problem with stack module
6 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack7a} != 1 && "$module7" != "" "problem with stack module
7 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack7b} != 1 && "$module7" != "" "problem with stack module
7 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack8a} != 1 && "$module8" != "" "problem with stack module
8 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack8b} != 1 && "$module8" != "" "problem with stack module
8 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack9a} != 1 && "$module9" != "" "problem with stack module
9 stackport"
Alarm : ${stack9b} != 1 && "$module9" != "" "problem with stack module
9 stackport"
</snmp-device-thresholds>
<snmp-device-display>
___________________________
module 1 : ${module1}
module 1, stackport 1 : ${stack1a}
module 1, stackport 2 : ${stack1b}
module 2 : ${module2}
module 2, stackport 1 : ${stack2a}
module 2, stackport 2 : ${stack2b}
module 3 : ${module3}
module 3, stackport 1 : ${stack3a}
module 3, stackport 2 : ${stack3b}
module 4 : ${module4}
module 4, stackport 1 : ${stack4a}
module 4, stackport 2 : ${stack4b}
module 5 : ${module5}
module 5, stackport 1 : ${stack5a}
module 5, stackport 2 : ${stack5b}
module 6 : ${module6}
module 6, stackport 1 : ${stack6a}
module 6, stackport 2 : ${stack6b}
module 7 : ${module7}
module 7, stackport 1 : ${stack7a}
module 7, stackport 2 : ${stack7b}
module 8 : ${module8}
module 8, stackport 1 : ${stack8a}
module 8, stackport 2 : ${stack8b}
module 9 : ${module9}
module 9, stackport 1 : ${stack9a}
module 9, stackport 2 : ${stack9b}
___________________________
</snmp-device-display>
__________________________
James P. Ashe
East Tennessee State University
Office of Information Technology
4 2 3 * 4 3 9 * 4 6 4 8
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Romo
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:33 AM
To: InterMapper Discussion
Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750
switch stacks?
Dave,
Do you create different probes for each size stack to ensure the correct
number of switches are monitored and prevent false alerts?
Chris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/08/2007 09:57 AM
Please respond to
"InterMapper Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Re: [IM-Talk] Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750 switch stacks?
We do this - here is the key OID:
Object moduleStatus
OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.3.1.1.10
Type INTEGER
Permission read-only
Status current
Values
1 : other
2 : ok
3 : minorFault
4 : majorFault
MIB CISCO-STACK-MIB ; - View Supporting Images
Description The operational status of the module. If the
status is not ok, the value of moduleTestResult
gives more detailed information about the
module's failure condition(s).
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:00 AM
To: InterMapper Discussion
Subject: InterMapper-Talk Digest - 02/08/07
InterMapper-Talk Digest - Thursday, February 8, 2007
Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750 switch stacks?
by "Steven Good" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: [IM-Talk] Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750 switch
stacks?
by "Chip Old" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: [IM-Talk] Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750 switch
stacks?
by "Paul Worth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RE: [IM-Talk] Has anyone used a probe to watch Cisco 3750 switch
stacks?
by "Steven Good" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
