When I used to do it at a previous job, I had to edit the alerts so the stay 
under 160 characters in length.
I was going of the idea that only the most important pages should go out via 
page/cell, and the less important ones can go out via email. What that meant is 
that if I get a page via SMS, it's 100% required to login and thus see the full 
size alert in the email. If that's the premise, then the page can be easily 
scaled down to 160 characters that will enough to send the name of the node 
failed and the kind of failure.

-andrey


--------------
Andrey Khomyakov | Senior Network Engineer | +1.617.879.5945



Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail, and any attachment to it, is intended to be 
confidential and might be legally privileged.  It is intended solely for the 
use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that reading, copying, disseminating or distributing this email is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system.  Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Willis
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [IM-Talk] Dealing with long SMS pages

Dear List,
When we're receiving SNMP traps and sending SMS pages out as a result of them, 
they are getting truncated.  This often means the most important info -- that 
at the end of the trap -- gets dropped.

What are other folks doing to get around this?  Can InterMapper do SMS slicing 
and send sequential pages with the full data?

Thanks
-lilmatt____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]

____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]

Reply via email to